The newest designers of the banner program put such half a dozen standards so you’re able to describe four flags (environmentally friendly, red, purple, and black colored)

Sense when you look at the appropriate and you will improper intimate behaviors

To research whether or not the TTT program expands belief in numerous sexual behavior, the latest ‘Adequate boundaries’ level (parent-report type) (Dekker et al, when preparing) is utilized. Even better, the brand new flag program (Dutch: het Vlaggensysteem) , is actually administrated on T1, T2 and you can T3 to measure the precision from wisdom out of acceptable and you can incorrect sexual conclusion. The new banner system includes taken photos that have youngsters and you can kids demonstrating sexual behavior in almost any facts and that is developed to discuss a good list of sexual routines with college students or teenagers. The new rating of your banner method is based on half dozen requirements having judging sexual behavior: agree, equality, coercion, right for age, suitable for context, and you can thinking-admiration [38, 39]. A specialist committee away from guy health care professionals find the ‘correct’ or most appropriate banner for every example in 2 seasons growth of the banner system. In the modern analysis the latest flag method is joined privately. The analysis assistant first shows you the meaning and rehearse of four flags and reveals the fresh adolescent 23 artwork one-by-one. With every example, the study assistant asks the latest adolescent to determine a banner, best judging the fresh new intimate conclusion shown in the illustration. The study secretary produces on interracial cupid dating website the chosen banner, in place of giving viewpoints toward adolescent during the try, and you can continues to the following example. The newest chose flags of kids try than the chose flags of your own professional committee, and you can obtained as the both correct or incorrect. A wrong banner you’ll indicate a more gentle wisdom or a more strict judgment, compared to the normative view of expert panel. We calculate an average percent of accurate judgments, milder judgments and you may stricter judgments for each example of the fresh new flag system.

Inappropriate intimate choices and susceptability

To research whether or not the TTT program reduces poor sexual behavior and you may vulnerability, multiple separate bits of brand new TTI (self-declaration letter = 8 and you may moms and dad-statement version letter = 12) (Dekker et al, in preparation) can be used. Analogy issues on father or mother-declaration TTI are: “My guy matches anybody else in which they don’t want to be touched”, “My personal child could probably lay his/the girl boundaries of intimate get in touch with”, “Does she or he actually wank at inappropriate moments, when you look at the incorrect ways otherwise urban centers?”. Certain analogy situations regarding the mind-report TTI is actually: “I remain contacting anyone, regardless of if see your face has actually indicated he/she doesn’t want people connection with me”, “I contact someone else in areas where they don’t really must become touched”, and “In general I’m good at allowing individuals understand what I am confident with and you will what i was uncomfortable that have”.

Furthermore, we use the Gender Dilemmas scale of the Child Choices Checklist (CBCL) [40, 41] at T1, T2 and T3, to choose the thickness away from psychosexual dilemmas. The Sex Problems level includes four products from sexual difficulties, considering sex a lot of, playing with very own snatch in public places, having fun with very own genitals way too much and also the desire to be on the most other sex [forty, 42]. Moms and dads rate for each goods to your CBCL into a good step three-area measure (0 = untrue, step 1 = slightly otherwise both real, dos = very true or have a tendency to true). Look you to integrated the fresh CBCL Intercourse Dilemmas level with the aim from measuring psychosexual trouble in the shape of parent declaration have served the message concurrent authenticity regarding the scale additionally the discriminant validity [42, 43].


To analyze if the TTT program escalates the adolescents’ mind-admiration the fresh new Care about-respect measure of your own Dutch Character Questionnaire (NPV-2) [forty two, 45] is actually administrated during the T1, T2 and T3. The fresh NPV-2 includes 132 things, scored on the an excellent about three-section scale (true, false and never incorrect, or untrue) and you will measures the next seven character traits: inadequacy, public stress, firmness, resentment, selfishness (complacency), popularity, and you will thinking-value. In the current data, we utilize the care about-admiration level, composed of 19 items that the teens respond to regarding on their own. Types of concerns are: “I tend to end up being insecure”, “I could handle jokes” and you will “I’m able to doing the thing i want”. Standard investigation out-of numerous populations (age.g., general and you can psychological people) arrive and you can reliability and you can legitimacy of your own self-confidence level are great (? = 0.86) .